INVESTIGATE — INDICT NICOLE MCCONN
San Diego: Child Trafficking Network (CTN)
INSIDE SAN DIEGO’S CHILD TRAFFICKING NETWORK
The Removal of Malaika and Xayah — and the Retaliation Against an Entire Family:
This post documents the actions surrounding the removal, transfer, and continued separation of two young children, Malaika and Xayah, from their biological family under the authority of San Diego County’s child-welfare system.
At the center of this case is Nicole McConn, Guardian ad Litem Supervisor, operating within and alongside Children’s Legal Services of San Diego.
What has unfolded is not child protection. It is retaliation, punishment, and the systematic destruction of a family after speaking out.
The Role of Nicole McConn — Guardian ad Litem Supervisor:
As Guardian ad Litem Supervisor, Nicole McConn holds a legal and ethical duty to protect children’s best interests. Instead, the documented record reflects a pattern of conduct that undermines that mandate.
Despite repeated public and formal concerns, McConn actively supported and protected Guardian ad Litem Lisa Haight. She continued backing Norma Olivares a non-relative caregiver, despite extensive evidence of alienation, false reporting, and interference with family bonds. After public exposure at the San Diego Board of Supervisors, control was escalated rather than eased, and family access was further restricted.
Most notably, retaliatory restraining orders were pursued or approved against a non-offending grandfather, using the children themselves as named parties. These orders were not issued because the grandfather possessed or endangered the children. They were issued because he spoke out. That distinction matters. Retaliation Disguised as “Protection”
After public testimony, media exposure, and formal complaints, the system’s response was not corrective — it was punitive.
Family access was restricted further, not restored. Reunification was delayed, not advanced. Retaliatory legal mechanisms were deployed. The children were transferred farther from their family, including international removal. This was not neutral case management. It was punitive escalation.
Judge Shopping and Judicial Leverage:
The case was routed into the courtroom of Judge Morales, imposing extreme travel burdens and extraordinary leverage on a family already under strain.
Statements made in court — including assertions that the children were better off with a “new family” — reveal a philosophy of replacement rather than reunification. This reflects forum manipulation designed to maximize leverage, not to serve justice or child welfare. That is not child protection. That is family severance.
Crimes and Violations Raised by the Record:
Based on documented filings, court actions, recordings, and public testimony, the record raises serious concerns, including:
Children treated as transferable placements rather than protected family members, constituting trafficking under color of law.
Severe emotional and psychological trauma inflicted on two toddlers through prolonged, unnecessary separation.
Cruel and unusual punishment of a mother who complied with services yet was met with retaliation instead of reunification.
Cruel and unusual punishment of a non-offending, law-abiding grandfather subjected to restraining orders, surveillance, intimidation, and forced isolation after speaking out.
Cruel and unusual punishment of an elderly, dependent great-grandmother deprived of contact, dignity, stability, and family presence. Violation of human dignity across generations.
Misuse of judicial power and dependency procedures to silence whistleblowing.
Failure to follow California kinship placement law.
False reporting and perjury embedded in addendum reports.
Misuse of federal Title IV-E incentives, prioritizing placement over reunification.
This is not a single violation. It is a pattern.
Collective Punishment:
No crimes were committed by this family.
No violence was committed by the grandfather.
No danger was posed by continued kinship contact.
What occurred was collective punishment — not for wrongdoing, but for refusing silence.
Why This Matters to San Diego:
This is not an isolated case.
If a Guardian ad Litem Supervisor is willing to weaponize restraining orders, protect false reporting caregivers, and escalate retaliation after public scrutiny, then other families may already be affected.
San Diego deserves to know:
Who else has been silenced?
Who else has lost children after speaking out?
Who else has been punished for demanding reunification?
Call to Action:
If you or your family have been harmed, retaliated against, or silenced by Nicole McConn, Children’s Legal Services of San Diego, or related Guardian ad Litem actions, come forward. Patterns matter. Silence protects abuse.
Final Statement:
This case is not about protecting children.
It is about protecting power, funding streams, and institutional reputation.
Free Evelyn Lopez. Free Malaika and Xayah. Bring Them Home,
End San Diego CWS’s cruel and unusual punishment.
Reunify this family — now!
— The Collective for Family Justice & Human Rights
Tip line: 619-678-1442
Freekeenan's Blog 
Leave a comment