FBI Shields Child Traffickers
EXPOSED: The FBI’s San Diego Branch Protects Predators — Not Children
Nearly a year ago on October 28, 2024, I called the FBI for help. My granddaughters had been kidnapped, tortured, and trafficked under the cover of San Diego County Child Welfare Services. I gave them everything — names, crimes, evidence.
Her response?
“Just do what they tell you.”
They ordered me to obey the very abusers destroying my family. They sided with kidnappers, liars, and perjurers — while pretending to serve justice.
Just the other week on August 1, 2025, my daughter-in-law Evelyn walked into the San Diego FBI office with a complete written case file — trafficking, retaliation, perjury, torture — all documented, all true. She walked out with the same answer: obey your abuser.
And we’re not the only ones. Jennifer Roysdon — another victim of this same San Diego corruption — publicly pleaded:
“The FBI turns their face to the gross negligence of these judges taking away our civil rights and trafficking our children to other countries. Please don’t let them take another one of my baby’s lives.”
Jennifer knows the truth. I know the truth. Evelyn knows the truth. Audra knows the truth. We’ve all gone to the FBI. We’ve all been ignored.
The FBI San Diego is not protecting families. They are shielding child traffickers and human rights violators. That makes them part of the crime — and part of the cover-up.
Neglect of duty / failure to perform official duties — if a federal employee willfully fails to act on credible information, especially about crimes or civil rights violations, it can be a violation of federal policy and, in certain cases, the law.
18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law — if the FBI ignores credible allegations of rights violations by public officials and does so willfully, it can fall here. This covers officials acting “under color of law” who willfully deprive people of constitutional rights.
Misprision of felony (18 U.S.C. § 4) — if a federal official knows about a felony, has the power to act, and deliberately chooses to conceal it or not report it.
Obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1510) — if their inaction effectively obstructs investigation or prosecution of crimes.
Gross negligence in public office — not always criminal unless tied to specific statutes, but it’s a breach of their sworn duty to uphold the law and protect citizens.
In advocacy and media terms, you could say:
“The FBI San Diego branch engaged in willful dereliction of duty by ignoring credible, documented reports of child trafficking, perjury, and government abuse, refusing to act despite having the authority and obligation to intervene.”
Freekeenan's Blog 
Leave a comment