San Diego > Vista: Child Trafficking Network (CTN)
Elder Targeted. Children Weaponized. Adoption Fast-Tracked
STOP THE FORCE ADOPTION OF MALAIKA AND XAYAH ROBINSON – CHILDREN BELONG WITH FAMILY – BRING THEM HOME
Kramer N.C.U.
We’re not harassing anyone. We’re fighting for our blood. When children ask to go home, a family has a duty to speak
Vista Court Issues Three-Year Retaliatory Restraining Order Cutting a Grandfather Off From His Own Granddaughters — Orchestrated by Nicole McConn, Nicole Montzingo-Avila, Chantal Hill, County Counsel (Name Unknown), Norma Olivares, and Presided Over by Judge Alejandro Morales
Nicole Montzingo-Avila, Nicole McConn, Chantal Hill, County Counsel (unknown name), Norma Olivares, Judge Alejandro Morales – State-paid officials operating within a system that financially incentivizes permanency outcomes, who supported decisions leading to permanent separation of children from their biological family.
A Courtroom Mobilized Against One Grandfather – Vista, Department 4 – February 10, 2026
Today in Vista, Department 4, an entire courtroom mobilized against a single RFA-approved grandfather.
Judge Alejandro Morales presided.
County Counsel stood in lockstep.
Social workers Nicole Montzingo-Avila and Chantal Hill were present.
Guardian ad Litem leadership through Nicole McConn advanced the restraining order narrative.
Non-relative caregiver Norma Olivares took the stand.
What was presented as a “hearing” shifted in real time.
The courtroom board read “trial.”
When questioned, the judge said “hearing.” Then “trial.” Then “hearing” again.
It was, in fact, a trial.
No counsel.
No discovery.
No addendum reports.
No social worker notes.
Repeatedly requested materials were not provided.
His advocate — a licensed social worker — was denied.
No witnesses permitted on his behalf.
He stood alone.
He invoked the rule to exclude witnesses. It was brushed aside.
On the stand, Nicole Montzingo-Avila labeled him “a danger” to his own granddaughters — despite prior written reports acknowledging a bond.
Norma Olivares repeated disputed allegations that he and the children’s mother followed her to her car — allegations directly challenged in sworn filings.
No blog posts were entered into evidence.
No printed pages were shown.
No direct threats were identified.
Yet speech was characterized as “harassment” and “incitement.”
Public documentation of court proceedings is not harassment.
Calling attention to government conduct is not incitement.
Advocating for the return of Malaika and Xayah Robinson to their biological family is not violence.
It is accountability.
The court acknowledged the case is “high-profile.”
It is high-profile because the public has been watching.
And while this restraining order was being pushed through, a notice was pulled from the mailbox reflecting movement toward permanent placement and adoption proceedings next week.
Permanent placement.
Adoption.
While the mother has completed her case plan.
When bonded children are cut off from a grandfather for three years while adoption boxes are being checked, that is not protection. It is separation enforced by court order.
Malaika and Xayah deserve transparency.
Their mother deserves fairness.
The public deserves to know what happened in Department 4.
— The Collective for Family Justice & Human Rights
Freekeenan's Blog 