oppression, tyranny, fascism, violation of human rights, family destroyed to death by cps, cws, dependency court stealing children, selling children, baby hunters,San Diego
I. Separation of Mother During a Medical Emergency David Miller transported Evelyn’s 3 year old daughter to the emergency room alone, excluding her mother, Evelyn Lopez, from a situation involving possible sexual abuse. This exclusion violates fundamental constitutional rights and state welfare laws.
> Violations:
14th Amendment Due Process (Troxel v. Granville)
California WIC § 308(b)
Santosky v. Kramer precedent on parental participation
2. Denial of Placement with an RFA-Approved Grandfather Despite the grandfather’s home being safe and state-approved, CWS denied Evelyn the opportunity to have overnights there, suggesting instead an isolated hotel room is someone who exhibits a personality of a pimp.
> Violations:
WIC §§ 361.3 and 309(a)42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(19)
Federal case law supporting familial placement
3. Unsafe and Inappropriate “Hotel” Placement Suggesting a hotel over a vetted relative’s home echoes the language of coercion—not child protection. Vulnerable women in such environments face serious risks, including trafficking.
4. Coercive Control and Constitutional Violations Imposing restrictions on where Evelyn could stay and with whom is not only unethical—it may breach her First Amendment rights to familial association.
5. Mishandling of a Suspected Sexual Abuse Case Isolating a parent during medical evaluation is not only traumatizing—it may also violate federal mandates like CAPTA and California’s Penal Code § 11166.
II. A Pattern of Retaliation and Bias: This isn’t an isolated misstep—it’s a series of actions suggesting retaliatory intent, systemic bias, and gendered control tactics. Denying reunification efforts, dangling visitation as leverage, and placing Evelyn in dangerous conditions reflect an unacceptable abuse of authority.
III. Rights and Legal Protections IgnoredConstitutional Rights: First and Fourteenth AmendmentsFederal Civil Rights: 42 U.S.C. § 1983State Protections: Family Code § 3020, Health & Safety Code § 1502Federal Placement Mandates: Title IV-E, 42 U.S.C. § 671
IV. Summary for Accountability> “David Miller, acting under color of law, deprived Evelyn Lopez of her constitutional and statutory rights by excluding her from her daughter’s emergency medical care, denying access to a safe RFA-approved home, and subjecting her to potentially dangerous conditions. These acts appear coercive, retaliatory, and unconstitutional, warranting investigation and legal remedy.”
V. This Is an Abomination — And It Must Be Confronted
David Miller’s conduct is not child protection. It is coercion, intimidation, and control—exercised under the color of law. When a social worker excludes a mother from her child’s medical crisis, denies her safe family support, and offers her a hotel like a trafficker would, that’s not a system in error—it’s an abomination.
We cannot allow public servants to weaponize their roles against vulnerable families. We cannot let the most sacred rights—of parent and child, of safety and dignity—be trampled under bureaucracy and unchecked power.
Justice begins when we stop tolerating injustice in silence. David Miller’s actions should be the last of their kind—not the latest.
David Miller’s actions are an abomination—against the law, against families, and against decency. If we allow them to go unanswered, we are all complicit.
Justice begins not when the courts speak—but when the people refuse to stay silent.
Freekeenan's Blog 